Child Custody

The courts of Georgia are intimately invested in the general welfare of minor children, as they serve as the parens patriae of all children in this State. This means the courts look to what is in the best interest of the children and ensuring that a parent has the ability and proper concerns for raising a child. There is no longer a presumption that a mother, or a father, will automatically receive custody. The law now states that where both parents are fit, minor children should have frequent and continuing contact with both, and that courts should encourage both parents to work together to jointly raise and be a part of their children’s lives.

There are two major issues in the judge’s determination of custody – legal custody and physical custody. Legal custody is that part of custody which provides for the rights and responsibilities affecting the rearing of a child, focusing on major decisions concerning the children, including the health care, education, religion, and extra-curricular activities of the children. As a general rule, the parties share in these decisions-making processes, but ultimately one parent, or even a third party such as a doctor or counselor, must have final authority. Included in this consideration would be access to the child’s medical, school, and all records to which a parent would be entitled.

The other consideration in custody awards is the physical custody of the children, where the children will essentially call home. While there are mixed views, as expected, from different judges on the issue of equally dividing or splitting the time a child spends with the parents, the parents may agree between themselves as to joint custody which a trial judge will generally authorize when it is in the child’s best interest. When a parent does not share equal custody, he or she will be authorized certain parenting time with the child such as weekends, once a week time, holidays and vacation times, and other memorable events such as birthdays. In order to have the judge approve the arrangement, the parties must submit a written Parenting Plan which provides the details of the children’s times with each parent during the year.

Should the case actually go to a hearing, there are certain factors which the judge must consider:

O.C.G.A. § 19-9-3:

(a) (1) In all cases in which the custody of any child is at issue between the parents, there shall be no prima-facie right to the custody of the child in the father or mother. There shall be no presumption in favor of any particular form of custody, legal or physical, nor in favor of either parent. Joint custody may be considered as an alternative form of custody by the judge and the judge at any temporary or permanent hearing may grant sole custody, joint custody, joint legal custody, or joint physical custody as appropriate.

(2) The judge hearing the issue of custody shall make a determination of custody of a child and such matter shall not be decided by a jury. The judge may take into consideration all the circumstances of the case, including the improvement of the health of the party seeking a change in custody provisions, in determining to whom custody of the child should be awarded. The duty of the judge in all such cases shall be to exercise discretion to look to and determine solely what is for the best interest of the child and what will best promote the child's welfare and happiness and to make his or her award accordingly.

(3) In determining the best interests of the child, the judge may consider any relevant factor including, but not limited to:

  1. The love, affection, bonding, and emotional ties existing between each parent and the child;
  2. The love, affection, bonding, and emotional ties existing between the child and his or her siblings, half siblings, and stepsiblings and the residence of such other children;
  3. The capacity and disposition of each parent to give the child love, affection, and guidance and to continue the education and rearing of the child;
  4. Each parent's knowledge and familiarity of the child and the child's needs;
  5. The capacity and disposition of each parent to provide the child with food, clothing, medical care, day-to-day needs, and other necessary basic care, with consideration made for the potential payment of child support by the other parent;
  6. The home environment of each parent considering the promotion of nurturance and safety of the child rather than superficial or material factors;
  7. The importance of continuity in the child's life and the length of time the child has lived in a stable, satisfactory environment and the desirability of maintaining continuity;
  8. The stability of the family unit of each of the parents and the presence or absence of each parent's support systems within the community to benefit the child;
  9. The mental and physical health of each parent;
  10. Each parent's involvement, or lack thereof, in the child's educational, social, and extracurricular activities;
  11. Each parent's employment schedule and the related flexibility or limitations, if any, of a parent to care for the child;
  12. The home, school, and community record and history of the child, as well as any health or educational special needs of the child;
  13. Each parent's past performance and relative abilities for future performance of parenting responsibilities;
  14. The willingness and ability of each of the parents to facilitate and encourage a close and continuing parent-child relationship between the child and the other parent, consistent with the best interest of the child;
  15. Any recommendation by a court appointed custody evaluator or guardian ad litem;
  16. Any evidence of family violence or sexual, mental, or physical child abuse or criminal history of either parent; and
  17. Any evidence of substance abuse by either parent.

There are also provisions in this statute for dealing with issues of domestic violence and military deployment.

Custody can be sought in a divorce case where there are minor children, in juvenile court where a party’s parental rights may be terminated in dependency proceedings, or after the original action is finalized in which a parent may file a modification action in which it is alleged that circumstances have changed which materially affect the children.

In a direct custody action, the wishes of a child may be considered so that at age 14 the child may select the parent with which he or she desires to live, subject to the judge’s determination it is in the child’s best interest. At age 11 to 14, the judge still must consider the child’s wishes, but that selection is not determinative.

A third party guardian ad litem may be employed to investigate the circumstances of the home life and allegations of each parent and deliver a report to the judge making a recommendation where the child should be placed and what parenting time should be awarded to the non-custodial parent. A psychological evaluation may also be ordered to involve the parents and child, and witnesses may be interviewed. The psychologist will employ a series of psychological tests to gain insight about the mental health and circumstances of the parents and child. The psychologist will also issue a report and may testify in court as to his or her finding, but the judge has ultimate discretion in these cases, and is not required to follow either report.

Client Reviews
★★★★★
The emotionally charged issues that arise in divorce cases evoke very different responses from judges who see many such cases than from parties who are embroiled in them. To be truly effective, a family law attorney must understand both perspectives--and the written law as well. Rob Wellon has a deep understanding of all of those things. As a consequence, he is a wise counselor and an effective advocate. He is a true leader of the family law bar. A Quote from Chris
★★★★★
Rob was highly recommended to me from a family friend as I was contemplating divorce after a long and difficult marriage. This was unfamiliar territory for me from the start; however, his paralegals and office staff were welcoming and professional from the beginning until the end. I had been looking for a lawyer with integrity, honesty and sound knowledge of the divorce laws as we were up against a difficult opposing party. At our initial meeting, Rob was fine with me bringing in a close confidante to listen. I found with every meeting and phone conversation that Rob remained confidently humble about his legal knowledge and stayed collected even when I was not. He stayed the course the whole way even though it seemed the end would never arrive, often having to remind me calmly that he had “been down this road before.” After staying up all night preparing my case for court, Rob was a tough but fair negotiator. He was able to protect my assets 100% and persuade the judge to award me legal fees. I’m forever grateful. Sally
★★★★★
Rob Wellon represents his clients aggressively but he is also the voice of reason. His years of experience as a family lawyer are undeniable when representing his clients. I would enthusiastically refer him to any person who sought an expert in this field. Marian
★★★★★
Attorney Robert Wellon gave me a first-rate performance when it came to my divorce. From the first meeting and throughout my divorce he was a warm and kind gentleman. He asked me what outcome I wanted from the divorce and from that moment going forward I only had to relax and let him litigate my case. He offered me such conformality and tranquility during a time of uncertainty. He has outstanding strategic capabilities, ensuring a successful outcome. He’s a highly respected lawyer locally and national community. He’s a very efficient lawyer that performs well and fights for those that can’t and gets through with a win. Atty. Robert Wellon is also a family man, a civic leader, sings at the church choir and a professor at Emory University Law School. All of these components make him an outstanding attorney in the field of family law. Vivian